Africa: Attracting Private Finance for Africa’s Development

InterServer Web Hosting and VPS

AFRICAN ECONOMIES ARE at a pivotal juncture.

The Covid-19 pandemic has reduced and brought economic activity to a standstill, and calls for the private sector to play more of a role in economic development.

This will be important – especially if countries are to enjoy a strong recovery and avoid economic stagnation.

If this does not happen, there is the reasonable risk that Africa’s hard-won economic gains of the last two decades, critical in improving living standards, could be reversed.

High public debt levels and the uncertain outlook for international aid limit the scope for growth through large public investment programmes.

Infrastructure – both physical (roads, electricity) and social (health, education) – is one area in which the private sector could be more involved.

Africa’s infrastructure development needs are huge – in the order of 20% of national output on average by the end of the decade.

How can this be financed?

All else equal, the main source of financing would be more tax revenue collections – something most countries are working towards.

But, given the scale of the needs, new financing sources will have to be mobilised from the international community and the private sector.

Africa is a continent that holds immense opportunity for private investors.

It has a young and growing population, and abundant natural resources.

Cities are seeing massive growth. Many countries have launched long-term industrialisation and digitalisation initiatives.

But significant investment and innovation are necessary to unlock the region’s full potential.

Recent research shows the private sector could, by the end of the decade, bring additional annual financing equivalent to 3% of sub-Saharan Africa’s output for physical and social infrastructure.

This represents about US$50 billion per year and almost a quarter of the average private investment ratio in the region.


At the moment the private sector is not involved much in financing and delivering infrastructure in Africa, compared to other regions.

Public entities, such as national governments and state-owned enterprises, carry out 95% of infrastructure projects.

The volume of infrastructure projects with private-sector participation has significantly declined in the past decade, following the commodity price bust.

The limited role of private investors is also apparent from an international comparison perspective: Africa attracts only 2% of global flows of foreign direct investment.

And when investment does go to Africa, it is predominantly to natural resources and extractive industries, not health, roads, or water.

To attract private investors and transform the way Africa finances its development, improvements in the business environment seem critical.

Our research shows that three key risks dominate international investors’ minds:

Project risk: Despite Africa presenting a wealth of business opportunities, the pipeline of projects that are truly ‘investment-ready’ remains limited. These are projects sufficiently developed to appeal to investors that do not want to invest in early-stage concepts or unfamiliar markets. Financial and technical support by donors and development banks can help countries fund feasibility studies, project design and other preparatory activities that expand the pool of bankable projects.

Currency risk: Imagine a project yields a return of 10% a year, but the currency depreciates by 5% at the same time. This would eliminate half of the profits for foreign investors. No wonder currency risk is a top concern for them. Prudent macroeconomic policy, combined with sound foreign-exchange reserve management can greatly reduce currency volatility.

Exit risk: No investor will enter a country if it does not have the assurance that it can also exit by selling its stakes in a project and recouping its gains. Narrow and underdeveloped financial markets may prevent investors from exiting by issuing shares. Capital controls can slow down or increase the cost of exiting. And when the legal framework is weak, investors may get bogged down in legal battles to have their rights recognised.


Improving the business climate is important, but not enough. Development sectors have certain structural features that make private-sector participation intrinsically complicated, even in the most favourable environments.

For instance, infrastructure projects often have large upfront costs, but their returns accrue over long periods of time, which can be difficult for private investors to assess. Private-sector growth also thrives on networks and value chains, which may not exist in new markets yet.

When these problems are acute, governments may have to provide extra incentives to make infrastructure projects attractive to private investors.

These incentives, which comprise various types of subsidies and guarantees, can be costly and carry fiscal risks.